SPN
season 12
A
collection of thoughts
As I had mentioned prior in my post of season 12 (X), I assume
because of unfamiliar behavior of the Winchester brothers, their mom
Mary and the turning upside down of SPN canon, that something
peculiar is going on. The obvious lack of a plot this season is quite
telling and than the confusing smorgasbord of stories that in the end
didn't quite fit with the final, saying the usual plot build up
wasn't clearly evident, makes one wonder if this season isn't
actually closed as one could assume. And season 13, which was
announced relatively early, is actually the highlight and revealing
season, and the season that definitely shows that the show runners
Singer / Dabb have created something new and got rid of the Carver
ballast.
Contrary to some viewers when watching the season 12 at first I
didn't like what SPN had presented, the show felt artificial, the
familiar SPN flair, the famous brotherly chemistry IMO was missing,
but also motive, common sense and logic. Just by presenting a Dean
calling Sam 'Sammy' or a shoved in brother hug, won't satisfy me. I
admit it's nice to see, but it won't change the fact that SPN had
tons of opportunities for brotherly moments, but than simply
deliberately ignored them. And this circumstance I find quite
interesting, because this bears the question, why would SPN create
such worthy scenes, but would not use them for their own benefit?
Further produce a soap opera-ish season, hence lack of an obvious
plot.
Sam
hidden in plain sight
Season 12 already began in the final episode of season 11 in “Alpha
& Omega”. I assume the moment Amara mentioned to Dean “Dean,
you gave me what I needed most. I want to do the same for you.” was
the pivotal moment. What if Amara gave Dean more than his mother
Mary? She said, she is giving Dean what he needed most... but not
what he had desired. The question we should all ask is, what was that
Amara needed, that she believed Dean needed it too? Is it that she
needed to comprehend the concept of family? That family is more than
love and hate? Honestly I don't know.
I
only know that the concept 'family is more than love and hate' is
repeated. At first the pigeon lady mentioned it in season 11 episode
11x23, remember “AMARA: So you hate him. WOMAN: Well,
a little bit. Sometimes. But you know family. Even
when you hate them, you still love them.” And now in the season
pre-finale episode 22 where Dean says to Mary “I love you, I hate
you, I forgive you”. So, it seems Dean grasped the concept of
family and the concept of love. Circle closed...well could be.
But than I thought that this 'mommy plot' is very odd, because it was
obvious that Sam was kept out the whole “family, love, hate”
theme. I mean he was the center for the Dean and mommy reunion in the
pre-finale episode 22, so why keep Sam deliberately out of the
discussion, when the topics are mainly concerning his past
experiences and how they naturally effected Dean? I mean Sam is
Dean's family and also Mary's son, so why keep him out of the mommy
plot? Further the most disturbing factor is, Sam still feels guilty
for things he's not responsible for, because of Mary's doing. Do you
see what a great conflict this could have been, I smell drama! Why
waste this opportunity? And oddly enough at the pre-finale episode
22, Dean is the one who forgives her for what she did to Sam. Um
Pardon me? Do you get the strangeness of this scene?
Notice how SPN again took Sam's autonomy away, he isn't even allowed
to talk about his own experiences, no matter what happened in the
past or present. I find this quite odd, and scary to say the least,
esp. when viewers are blindly cheering Dean's emotional outburst
towards Mary and thereby totally ignore the fact that Sam is also
family and he was the major victim of the past events. Dean's monolog
with Mary was as if Sam in general was dead, mute, invincible and
therefor Dean had to be his voice, his advocate . The used argument,
namely Mary was scared to confront Sam, makes no sense in the sense
of 'drama / plot', because literally the conflict is kept out of the
drama. But without a conflict there is no drama, hence no plot. The
result is just a pile of senseless emotional gobbledygook.
That's why at the end of the pre-final episode 22, when Sam says,
when walking into the bunker, she doesn't have to be scared of him,
sounds nice, but this statement is a huge farce, but it's not only a
farce, the made statement is without reason, because Sam still
doesn't know and isn't aware, that all his suffering and guilt
tripping is mainly because of Mary's deal with the yellow eye demon.
Remember the whole season over Sam was kept out of the family plot.
He is still kept in the dark, kept deliberately by Dean and Mary in
the unknown. So why the hell are almost everyone cheering the family
hug in episode 22? That scene is just portraying Sam as a utter fool.
Because no one in the would, when walking into a seemingly private
talk about one self, and than only hearing a partial of what is said,
than say 'everything is okay'. No in reality the person would ask WTF
is going on, wotcha talking behind my back! Again a great drama aka
plot, just ignored and thrown away. Why? Why is Sam's inquisitive
nature being reduced to blind ignorance?
Which brings me to episode 2 “Mamma Mia” where Sam says to Mary
“Her being here fills out the blanks”. And this said without
having even talked with her. Remember this scene happened after Sam
was tortured and truly believed Dean is dead, and well Mary, hence
once a dead mommy, who has than been resurrected. But nay why use
such drama, lets ignore the elephant in the room, and let Sam say
some emotionally senseless stupid stuff. Further let the viewers
assume that Sam is now a mind reader. I mean to fill out the blanks,
implies that knowledge / information has been transferred. And
normally humans do this by communicating. But we viewers didn't see
or hear Sam communicating with his mother. So from where did his
enlightenment come from? And here IMO lies the major discrepancy or
oddity of this season. It was very peculiar that Sam didn't even once
articulate his emotional state and have an intimate clearing
discussion with Dean or Mary. Or for crying out loud just being
curious. So from where did Sam get his enlightenment to forgive Mary?
We viewers had to guess and thereby interpreted Sam's presumed
feelings, concerning his kidnapping, torture, believed dead brother
and resurrected mother, therefor in the end we don't know nothing.
But than at the same time I'm suppose to believe, because shown in
the pre-finale episode 22, that Sam had issues with being a leading
figure. Really? And again viewers are cheering Sam's speech to the
hunters, but I wonder why, it literally made no sense. Now since Sam
didn't articulate in the season his lack of self esteem, one could
than assume his insecurities could have been recognized on screen.
Therefor the major question is, when during the season was his
insecurity topic, hence plot, obvious? When Sam killed the monsters
of the week, or when Sam saved the BMoL from the vampires and thereby
killed the Alpha-Vampire? Even in the past he took the lead when
necessary. So from where does his “its easier to follow than to
lead” brain struck come from? There was not once an indication for
such plot. So what was Sam's role in episode 22 than actually about?
This leads to the most interesting question of this season, why was
Sam portrayed like a mute hero without a cause? Let's be realistic
Dean had this season all major plot determining dialogs, dialogs that
told us viewers in what kind of state of mind he was. We know the
reason of why he was at first happy, than pissed and than forgiving
with Mary. Frankly this mommy plot was utterly shoved into the
viewers face. So, why was Sam placed onto the sideline? He ignorantly
and nonchalantly accepted everything that was thrown at him. There
was no necessity for SPN to neglect Sam's role in the family drama.
Remember Dean, Sam and John and how dramatic these scenes were? How
energetic they were? How Sam and Dean interacted in combination with
their father? The exploding dialogs? By comparing these father scenes
with the mommy scenes, one will clearly notice the difference in the
trio their dynamics.
Sam
the mute hero without a cause
The
reason why I name Sam the “mute hero without a cause” is because
a) he was kept silenced concerning his torture by the BMoL and
Mary's deal. And b) what was this season his motivation to act? FYI
according to Wikipedia “Motivation
is a theoretical construct used to explain behavior. It gives the
reason for people's actions, desires, and needs. Motivation can also
be defined as one's direction to behavior, or what causes a person to
want to repeat a behavior and vice versa. A motive is what prompts
the person to act in a certain way, or at least develop an
inclination for specific behavior.”
Therefor the
question what motivated Sam this season is utterly valid. Keep in
mind, Dean
had Sam, Mary and the BMoL, these external factors were the cause,
hence motivation for Dean to react and therefor to get heavily into
action, hence attributes of a plot. But what about Sam? Every topic
that could have been a cause / motive for conflict / drama and prompt
him to react, like the BMoL, Dean, Mary or even Lucifer were from the
beginning of the season, in a subtle manner kept away from him. It
was as if Sam was floating in an invisible bubble. He was present,
but nothing could or would touch / motivate him and therefor prompt
him into action. Except for some heroic actions, that in contrast had
nothing to do with his emotional state, his inner 'family' circle or
the major story line, hence Mary, the BMoL and Lucifer. What an odd
juxtaposition, on the one hand we have Dean who is obviously reacting
because of obvious reasons, and Sam on the other hand who obviously
doesn't react, even though obvious reasons are given.
Juxtaposition
This
is in so far quite interesting, because SPN this season used in their
directing mainly all kind of forms of juxtapositions. The most
obvious one was episode 12 “Stuck In The Middle (with you)”. And
as every film geek knows this technique (juxtaposition) is used in
the 1992 film, “Reservoir
Dogs”
directed by Quentin Tarantino. A brutal torture scene is juxtaposed
with the playing of a cheerful pop song, “Stuck
in the Middle with You”,
on the soundtrack. Soundtrack Dissonance is utilized to, in literary
terms, pose a juxtaposition with the intent of making a thematic
statement and/or widening our emotional distance to the events before
us, thus allowing us to view the piece in a more removed,
intellectual manner. And in the case of “Reservoir Dogs”
Tarantino’s intend was to manipulate the viewers perception, namely
by reacting positively to the pop song, the viewer was literally
caught in the act of having 'fun' or 'enjoying' the brutal torture
scene.
And in our case, the obvious contrast (juxtaposition) is not only
Sam's internal (family) non-motivation vs his external (non-family)
motivation. But this also could be seen in the episode 12 “Stuck In
The Middle (with you)” at the beginning of the scene, when all
where sitting at the dinner ordering their breakfast. The only one
who didn't order food was Sam, and not as assumed the angel. Sam in
contrast just complained about the bad WIFI connection. In retrospect
it's conspicuous that Dean and the others at the table, except for
Sam, were so keen, despite the comedic effect, that the angel, who
hasn't the need for any food, orders himself a breakfast. Further the
scene with Dean teaching the angel 'flirt' lessons appears actually
fabricated. Simply because Dean knows (since Kripke era) how the
angel reacts to women, and since than he never bothered to act in
such 'pair off' manner with the angel. So why now and why in such
obvious striking behavior?
A
further oddity, namely what did Sam, by mentioning “I
downloaded all the bunker’s files to a new
archive,...” have to do with shown scene at the diner? Again it
made no sense. The information given by Sam didn't correspond with
the ongoing dialog at the table. Furthermore
no one seemed to be bothered that Sam hadn't placed an order. Now
(speculation) what if Sam, by saying something's wrong with the WIFI
connection, it is really meant that Sam as a person, is literally not
or loosely connected to his surrounding (reality)? This could in a
way not only explain Sam's dissonance / contrast behavior at the
diner, but also during the whole season. Saying he is stuck in the
middle of, who knows, two realities, like a quasi hallucinogenic
world and reality?
Brake
onto the other side
What do I mean with the term hallucinogenic world. I know it's highly
speculative, but just for a sec, lets get crazy. All episodes where
Sam acts heroically appear peculiar, at first they are very Sam
centric, than they contain Sam specific material, such as his psychic
abilities, the 'yellow eye demon', his brother Dean, the death of his
mom Mary and at last Lucifer. All these mentioned life events are
perceived by Sam as something negative, something he until today
still feels guilty about. Now what if Sam is 'hallucinating' these
negative events into a positive event? Where he's not the freak, the
failure anymore or something to feel guilty about, but in his mind
he's the hero who saves the day, like the way he perceives his
brother Dean. This could be the reason why Dean and Mary didn't react
in a normal manner to Sam's heroic adventures. Simply because in
reality, hence the real world they are not participating in Sam's
hallucinogenic adventures, and why SPN canon is turned upside down.
Or because he is still in the belief that Dean is dead, and
everything we saw this season is Sam creating in his mind a world
where he is able to save Dean and than thereby the day.
This thesis, namely Sam withdrawing into an imaginative heroic world,
would correspond with the ending of episode 12x01 “Be Calm And
Carry On”, where Sam after his mind was fractured (broken mirror),
and than was defeated by his tormentor Toni Bevelle. Keep in mind,
SPN didn't touch the kidnapping and torture subject after episode
12x02 had aired. It was miraculously (sleight of hand) kept out of
the season's narrative.
Just
so people can comprehend, according to Wikipedia a “Hallucination
is a perception in the absence of external stimulus that
has qualities of real perception.”
So therefor when a hallucination has the qualities of real
perception, than the perceived hallucination IS perceived as reality.
Now in our case interestingly enough hallucinations can also be
caused by torture aka enhanced interrogation.
According
to Wikipedia “"Enhanced
interrogation techniques"
or "enhanced
interrogation"
is a euphemism
for the U.S. government's program of systematic torture of detainees
by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Defense Intelligence
Agency (DIA), and various components of the U.S. Armed Forces at
black sites around the world, including Bagram, Guantanamo Bay, and
Abu Ghraib, authorized by officials of the George W. Bush
administration. Methods used included beating, binding in contorted
stress positions, hooding, subjection to deafening noise, sleep
deprivation to the point of hallucination,
deprivation of food, drink, and withholding medical care for wounds,
as well as water-boarding, walling, sexual humiliation, subjection to
extreme heat or extreme cold, confinement in small coffin-like boxes,
and repeated slapping.”
Now
interestingly a lot of these mentioned torture methods that can cause
hallucinations, including the drug induced torture, were used by the
BMoL. But oddly enough, again, Sam's kidnapping and torture were
after episode 2 “Mamma Mia” never brought up again, just
ignorantly glossed over. Why? Why invest screen time and money for
such sensible topic and than not dramatize and exploit it for a plot?
Why such obvious wast of opportunities? Or Dean and Sam being
prisoners of the government, held in a secret black site...why show
and invest in such drama, but than utterly ignore it. This is more
than bad screen writing. This has method, or as Hamlet would put it
“Though this be madness,
yet there is method in’t.”
One of the many explanation I have, but the only one that in a way or
other makes sense is that I assume the hallucination we saw in
episode #2 is still on going. This could explain Sam, Dean's and
Mary's truly not normal / familiar behavior. Lucifer's sudden
disinterest for Sam, hence his deliberately designed customized
metaphysical vessel. The angel Castiel truly stupid and incoherent
behavior. Or the BMoL's incoherent illogical management as a secret /
occult society. Seriously their actions didn't make any sense. Just
think how stupid this appears, a paramilitary unite 'guarding' an
occult society their HQ, hidden in a warehouse. Because, remember
Magnus, the American MoL? What a contrast, he hid a whole mansion
through magic, and these Brits use hand scanners. Makes you wonder.
But than Mrs. Hess demands a portal to escape. Any logic there? Nope,
thought so. Since this season makes absolutely no sense, further is
filled up with illogical actions, one could come to the conclusion
that what we have seen until now could be an on going dream,
hallucination or an AU. I mean there must be a reason for the pile of
such incoherent stupidity.
Further this 'hallucination' scenario could also in a way explain the
use and odd cross reference to the barb wired bat (Lucy) used in the
series “The Walking Dead”, which is a significant symbol used by
the main antagonist Negan of the show, played by Jeffrey D. Morgan.
Who once played the father figure of Dean and Sam Winchester. Does
anybody get the weirdness of this scene? I know the scene appeared to
be funny, but the ca 3 minute scene doesn't justify the effort and
costs it took to purchase the copyrights from FOX to use this world
wide known iconic prop. Furthermore Dean saying (paraphrased) “their
dad would have loved the bat” makes no sense. Because John
Winchester an ex-marine would have never used this blunt instrument
to fight off zombies. He as a marine would have known, as Dean should
have known too, that using this blunt weapon would cost far to much
energy to fight off zombies than in comparison to a sharpen machete.
The bat used in “The Walking Dead” is a symbol of ultimate
archaic ruling man power, not more. So, what was this scene all
about? Why the need to portray Dean as a silly amateur, or a
Neanderthal? Which BTW is interesting, because the only ones who
think hunters are Neanderthals, are the BMoL.
Though this said, on the other hand I still have to accept, that a
rose is just a rose, meaning the season was just simply badly
written. If so, than dear SPN crew please contact some IMO awesome
fan-fiction writers, they know where the priorities lie and also
astonishingly have knowledge of the supernatural realm, they could
save the day, because thanks to them I'm still in love with the show.
Much
ado about nothing
A further reason why I didn't like the season and both end episodes
22 & 23 is because IMO major made dramatic statements haven't at
the end been solved. Not even one single hint was given. We still
have absolutely no clue who the old men in London are and if they are
still in the game, or why SPN mentioned to us that Toni Bevelle has a
son. Now was this given information important or just wasted screen
time? Nor do we know what the reaper Billie's 'cosmic consequences'
are.
Of course I grasp the idea of suspense, but just by mentioning a
threat or lethal consequence, and than in the end deliberately ignore
these dramatic statements, can't uphold the suspense. In my case I
got annoyed, because for example I wanted to know more about the
BMoL. And the used BMoL protagonists Mike, Toni and Fetch didn't
satisfy my curiosity. Their motive and actions made no sense.
Actually I thought they were utterly boring, incoherent, their
actions inconsistent and therefor confusing.
The
same with the reaper Billie. Without any storyline, the reaper just
appeared and than was eliminated. Just like that... oh. Than the
cosmic consequences vanished into thin air, to never been seen or
heard again.
As I stated at the beginning of my text, these not solved 'mysteries'
could be revealed in the coming season 13. Personally I doubt it.
Because it wouldn't be the first time that SPN mentioned something
that would have devastating effects, but than would just ignore it.
NO
sympathy for the devil
Why SPN recycled the Lucifer story, would be a good question asked at
a convention or PR conference, but sadly a majority of con goers and
so called journalist are mainly occupied with trivial stuff than
content concerning the plot of the show. So probably we will never
find out what SPN was thinking when recycling, thanks to Carver, the
utterly boring and unnecessary Lucifer character. But than one has to
thank SPN for the worst portrayal of the diabolical figure, because
now when ever Lucifer is mentioned and shown in the series a
collective yawning can be heard throughout the whole SPN audience.
So, yeah SPN you've done a good job.
In retrospect SPN had portrayed over 11 years three characterizations
of the devil. At first we saw Kripke's fallen angel, depicted as a
truly diabolical Satan. Disguised as an understanding passionate
angel of light, but than when light fell on to it, the cunning,
narcissist nature of this heavenly creature broke through. Than we
had Carvers humanized devil, a heavenly metaphysical entity portrayed
in a human-ish manner with preadolescence daddy issues. The
philosophical fallacy should be obvious. And now the show runner duo
Singer & Dabb took Carver's humanized Satan and presented it
having an existential midlife crisis. By demystifying the
metaphysical entity, SPN turned the once intriguing heavenly being
into an everyday soap opera-ish boring dude.
Now I have no explanation for why the show runners made the decision
to portray the devil in such boring fashion. Especially putting so
much time in it's vessel career. I mean the whole ensnaring of the
singer Vincente was a total copy of how the fallen angel tried to
lure Sam into saying 'yes'. Therefor no big surprise, nothing new. So
why the need to waste screen time for an already known story? I mean
SPN can't be that stupid? Or why at the mid season finale focus on
the devil and his actions, that had absolutely nothing to do with the
main protagonists of the show? We can assume that the show runners
Singer & Dabb are utterly aware that the audience is more
interested in the brothers their doing than in a side character.
The whole devil story line was IMO boring, illogical and a waste of
time. Simply because it didn't involve the Winchesters, didn't
correspond with canon and it was utterly predictable. Now about the
devil it's spawn. This contradicts the whole SPN canon. Just think
about it, if the devil can produce earthly baby devils, just by
having sexual intercourse with human females, than why didn't it do
that at the beginning of the show, when Sam, his anointed vessel,
said no. Just imagine, 12 years later hundreds of supernaturally
grown up devil juniors roaming the planet, causing havoc. This truly
would have been the Armageddon.
The
Finale
IMO the final of the season was utterly unnecessary and incoherent.
What did the final have to do with the Winchesters? Or in any fashion
with the season? Correct absolutely nothing. So why should I as a fan
of the Winchesters be excited for the coming season 13? Reality is,
I'm not. Sam has encountered so many supernatural entities and
mastered them, so why should this devil spawn encounter make any
difference? Well it would have made a difference if Sam and Dean
would have been emotionally involved with the Lucifer story instead
of the IMO boring angel Castiel. And sorry to say but their mom Mary
wasn't the hit either. So, she suddenly got into mommy feels after
Dean confronts her in her own head, and than wants to 'save' her
sons. Seriously, why now?? And why in such stupid manner? Oh,... I'm
gonna take those brass knuckles an gonna smack the devil it's
face.... how pathetic, mini muscle without brain.
Than the demon Crowley's so called engagement and following sacrifice
at the finale. Where was the story? The whole time the demon is
playing preadolescence kinder-garden games with the devil, but
without the involvement of the Winchester, and now the script writers
are suddenly reminded that there are the Winchesters, hence THE major
and only protagonists of the show, so lets let Crowley interact with
them. Geez what an awful plot-less story, no wonder M. Sheppard was
pissed. And than, what are they now doing, exact, namely nothing, but
than, oh, oh, they 'find' (face palm) a lead and than the opportunist
narcissist demon sacrifices it self to save the Winchesters. WTF!
Who's writing these stories, a three year old? What happened to
motivation, common sense and logic? And Crowley's ritual, how stupid
can stupid get? The demon is literally dead, hence an evil spirit
possessing a dead human body, so how can the ritual function when
something living(!) has to be sacrificed? Sure it used the angle
blade, but it only thereby destroyed it's own essence, not more.
But the highlight was the most boring, and I mean utterly boring
scenes with the once interesting, but now useless angel Castiel.
Really? This was suppose to be the grand finale of the season, a
moronic angel playing a confused guardian of a stupid woman who can't
comprehend that she's carrying the devils spawn. A creature who's
life giver is a metaphysical being, who wants to annihilate humanity!
Conclusion
I deliberately didn't touch the 'Mary' story line, simply because IMO
her story was unnecessary. Further destroyed the whole once known SPN
concept. Her made into a über-hunter is just serving the momentary
ruling ideology which lacks reason. Just try to comprehend the
concept SPN is trying to sell. The female actor Samantha Smith is 47
years old, is playing a ca. 25-28 year old woman, who is a
über-awsome hunter than her 37 and 34 year old sons. Now how can I,
as a 49 year old woman, take her serious? I can't sorry. Every time I
saw her fighting and running around like a tough gal, I had to laugh.
It was so pathetic. The same with the character Jody. The
feminization of SPN is truly questionable. Once SPN was balanced
there where reasonable female characters like Helen and Jo but also
equal male characters like Bobby and Rufus. But now we only get to
see tough über-women and dumbed down men.
A long time ago SPN was about two brothers fighting against all odds
and their inner conflict. Great classical story telling. Like a
modern version of the Greek and Roman mythology Castor and Pollux.
Drama at best. But now IMO SPN season 12 was without substance just
serving some loud fanatic fans, and Hollywood / corporate media's
post modernistic nihilistic ideology, that in it's core simply
neglects reason. So, in the end I can only hope that the following
season will at least have a plot, where BOTH major protagonists are
involved.
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen